It is true that, in this contemporary era, technogies are being advanced at an unprecedented rate. However, number of people introspect that dilapidated method of teaching or giving electures is a good way whereas, other believe everything should be done by online. According to my perspective, tutors should be used new gadgets for giving information and I am totally agreed with it.
To commence with, online sessions are being played an indispensable role in everyone life these days. Additionally, people can take their online lectures according to their time preference whatever they want because it saves our time. Another reason could be, poor people also can afford these type of online courses in less amount of money or in free which allow them to build good career and earn lots of money. To exemplify, according to a survey, it can be manifested that overabundance of courses and lectures are being provided by YouTube in free of cost and many people are taking advantage of this and generating high revenue in their life.
Looking at the other view, old method of giving lectures in classroom or in auditoriums are also a good way because students can easily learn lots of thing in face to face meetings with their teachers. Moreover, more questions can be asked by Students at the same time but it's not possible in online sessions. Looking on the other reason, we can easily discuss with our colleagues as well and clarify all the things entirely. For instance, it has looked many times those students get more marks who prefer to study offline as compared to those teenagers who love to take online classes.
On a concluding note, undoubtedly, offline ways are best for giving information to other students and they can take plethora of benefits yet, we must understand that those people are taking advantage who do not have much money. Apart from it, it saves time and help for enhancing our brain our.
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online Do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games what are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 67
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games what are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 61
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as older houses in the local area Others disagree and say that local authorities should allow people to build houses in the style s of their own choice Discuss both view and give your own 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, people can take their online lectures according to their time preference whate...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...d way because students can easily learn lots of thing in face to face meetings with their tea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91411042945 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62426853644 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4679873928 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251347463299 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903081551947 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579188082498 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155274986428 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688093551734 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, people can take their online lectures according to their time preference whate...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of things'.
Suggestion: lots of things
...d way because students can easily learn lots of thing in face to face meetings with their tea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, apart from, for instance, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91411042945 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62426853644 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4679873928 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251347463299 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903081551947 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579188082498 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155274986428 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688093551734 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.