Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave. Do you agree or disagree? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
Watching movies and television is an extremely simple and common daily routine for lots of people. However, we do not aware that those movies and TV programs will strongly influence the way people behave. There are two reasons that make me feel this way. I will explore more specific in the following essay.
First of all, it is a very ubiquitous strategy that the political parties buy the news which compliment them and attack their antagonists. As doing this, the party could make their electors to be more loyal to them and even persuade those uncertain voters to vote for them, because the news they watch always say about their merits. Through the news on the television could truly influence the decision of the election. For example, when I was at 20, I just got the permission to vote. I didn’t concern about the politic before, so I totally didn’t know which candidate I should vote. But news continuous reporting about the negative things of the one of the candidates. At last, I vote the other one who bought the news.
Moreover, the movies often having lots of violence scenes or erotic information which is needed for the drama. However, it might influence the child to imitate those bad behaviors. For example, I heard about a news said that the murderer kills people because he saw the violence movies when he was young. He wanted to become the protagonist that he thought is cool enough. In the virtual world in movies killing people might not be a big deal, but in the real world should have to be sent into jail. The movies of those bad behaviors could let the children to imitate, because the children can not judge things right. Those influence could make the child’s life totally different.
In conclusion, I believe that the movies and the television strongly influence the way that people behave. This is because the information of the television could change one’s mind, like the strategy of the politic parties, and the violence and exotic scenes could be imitated from the children which have the chance leading the children’s bad behaviors when they grow up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-10 | meet96301 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | nph | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-06 | Yagya Limbu | 81 | view |
| 2022-09-06 | Yagya Limbu | 75 | view |
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 60
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century old tradition of all female education and begin admitting men Pointing to other all female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation 60
- During our careers we work with many different kinds of people All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits In your opinion which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker a serious attitude regarding their work 70
- Pluto was first discovered in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh and was classified as a planet at that time However in 2006 the International Astronomical Union designated it as a dwarf planet claiming it failed to fulfill the requirements for being classified as a 78
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun s 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84764542936 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43795012277 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509695290859 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2055661037 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16538498195 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589742152471 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798378892924 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126294529047 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799388281363 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.