The diagram shows Lakeside development between the years 2000 and 2009.
Given are two maps depicting the modifications of an undetermined lakeside in two specific years in the past, 2000 and 2009.
It is conspicuous that the layout of the area is more likely to undergo some significant changes with the addition of several amenities to satisfy the human need.
To begin with the west of the river, there were two residential areas which were interleaved with an art centre in 2010; however, the second building was demolished to give space for a shopping centre. Besides, a school, similar to the first residential area, remained intact throughout the time. Adjacent to the unchanged residential building, there was a derelic warehouse and an old town, the former was dismantled and replaced by a car park and the latter was splited into two facilities including offices and university. Eventually, a cinema was erected to replace the art centre in 2009.
When it came to the east of the river, a small industrial complex and a residential area were totally knocked down to make room for a huge industrial complex with various modern factories inside. Another significant swing in the north of the river was the lake which was shrunk into a pond after a nine-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- In some countries more and more people becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are reasons for this How can people research this 88
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 73
- The map below compared 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 61
- School should not force children to learn foreign languages To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- how sugar is produced from sugar cane 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ific years in the past, 2000 and 2009. It is conspicuous that the layout of the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76147811196 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0371332182 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0761517944665 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414866917747 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718127609836 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661685277378 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895006097294 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ific years in the past, 2000 and 2009. It is conspicuous that the layout of the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76147811196 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591133004926 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0371332182 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0761517944665 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414866917747 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718127609836 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661685277378 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895006097294 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.