The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Because illegal immigrants pose such threats every effort mu

Essay topics:

“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin.”

The argument which appeared in a newspaper editorial, states that any country autonomy is based upon its borders strength and illegal immigrants pose threats to country's economy and nation identity and urge that every possible efforts must be made to send back illegal immigrants to their country of origin. Though, this piece of agrument appeared in a newspaper editorial states a few reason to send back illegal immigrants back to their country, the argument is primarily based on three unstated assumptions which the author made before reasoning out for sending back illegal immigrants.
Firstly, the opening section of the argument says that the autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders, here, the author made an assumption that the entry of illegal immigrants to any country can hold such power as to rule over the other country, thereby hampering its autonomy. Even if few illegal immigrants enter the country by some means, the strength of any country may not be endangered. If we take United States for instance, it is true that the immigrants policy is very strict and properly mananged, but still suppose a family somehow managed to enter the boarder of United states and may settled there, they can't ruin or make a significant impact to country's economy or national identity and the effort that may be made after to put a check on all and then sending them back may impact the economy more. Though, it is correct that such illegal immigation is wrong and should be checked but the affect of immigation on country's economy or identity is not applicable to all countries.
Furthermore, the author assumes that economy and national identity of country can be endangered, just by illegal immigrants, again this is not applicable to all countries, yes if a counries population is low and a lot of illegal immigrants are coming then it is going to endanger the country's national identity but suppose if it is country like India or China, even if 100 of immigrants are there, it is going to put almost a neligible impact on the country's identity. A country is not known why its immigrants poulations and this is largely depend on the ration of immigrants to country population.
Lastly, the author assumes that sending back the illegal immigrants is the solution to this problem. It is assumed that the intention of each one of them are bad. Suppose hundreds and hundereds years back if their grandparents entered the country illegally and now their children are living there and are proving out to be profilic to the country, then sending them back to their own country is not a prudent way to deal with this situation.
In conclusion, if the author that given more of stated information about the above mentioned assumptions, the conclusion in the arguments might have been supported better with better reasons towards sending back the illegal immigrants and how this process will overall pacify the economy or identity.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-11 Kaira 48 view
2023-08-01 BusariMoruf 50 view
2023-07-14 Gnyana 78 view
2023-06-28 Technoblade 70 view
2023-04-01 aiswaryae 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user amisha23 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'few reasons'.
Suggestion: few reasons
...eared in a newspaper editorial states a few reason to send back illegal immigrants back to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'immigrants'' or 'immigrant's'?
Suggestion: immigrants'; immigrant's
...tates for instance, it is true that the immigrants policy is very strict and properly mana...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 638, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ited states and may settled there, they cant ruin or make a significant impact to co...
^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...migrants poulations and this is largely depend on the ration of immigrants to country ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, may, so, still, then, as to, for instance, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 11.1786427146 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2457.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 497.0 441.139720559 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94366197183 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64057198933 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 784.8 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.8473053892 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.092444935 57.8364921388 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.75 119.503703932 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.4166666667 23.324526521 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.70786347227 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48050495494 0.218282227539 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206795075381 0.0743258471296 278% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142773447129 0.0701772020484 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269788389095 0.128457276422 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137768623512 0.0628817314937 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 14.3799401198 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 48.3550499002 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.197005988 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.26 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.1389221557 165% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 11 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 497 350
No. of Characters: 2422 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.722 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.873 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.573 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 190 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 153 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 54 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 41.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 21.258 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.446 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.446 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.223 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5