Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these
Moral Judgement is an essential pillar, upon which the entire leadership rests. Moral Judgement by defination mean to give a wise and prudent judgment for any case by being impartial to any arcane advantages a leader may receive. I mostly disagree with the context that, sound moral judgment is not as important as a leader's ability to maintain the respect of their peers. No doubt, respecting peer leader is vital but not as essential as making sound and correct judgment, as correct and moral judgment is most important aspect of any leader.
Many people may have general belief that, a leader should have a quality to maintain the respect of his or her peers, which is true provided, leader must listen to the ideas and thoughts of their peers. In any community, it is important that a leader give all his/her peers a chance, to listen to their ideas and respect their beliefs. For instance, if we take any political party, there is one main leader, but that does not mean that he/she have full supermecy to take any decision or neither they should have any right to insult their peers. Leadership is not dictatorship, true essence of leadership lies in cooperation, maintaining decorum and utimately taking right, sound moral decision for any case.
Though it is important to respect the peers, in my opinion, it is more important to make right judgment. The organization can comprise of different types of people, many are corrupt and think of their own advantages, if leader will keep on listening to such peers and acknowledging their ideas, then will be impossible for any leader to make right sound moral decision. For instance, if we again consider any political party, there is slight chance that all the members of the party think alike, some will be prudent, some will be arrogant, some will be corrupt but at the end a leader has to make a moral judgement, irrespective of the fact that their judgement make be considered offensive to some of his/her peers. This is in fact one of the important quality of leadership to identify prudent people within their group.
Respecting the peers should not ne confused with favouring them in every circumstances. On the other hand, it does not mean disrespecting them. Conducting a proper method while taking any judgement is important. There can be certain parameters upon which a judgement can be measured and made. Moral judgement should look for welfare of majority of population, at the same time maintaining integrity of the system. Casting votes to pass the bill, like the one we are familiar with in parliaments, are right and wise method of conducting any judgement. This also gives sense of importance and accountability within all the member of the organization, and not just the leader.
In a nutshell, people may have general opinion that leaders must respect their peers and this very quality is most important, but in my opinion, it is generally more importance that the leader utimately provides with moral judgement because that is what is expected most out of a leader. Their judgement reflect their work and trust. Respecting peers should not be mingled with right moral and ethical judgement, causing welfare of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- First step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 66
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 61
- The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Because illegal immigrants pose such threats every effort mu 83
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern technologies such as smart phones and computers What is the cause of this and what are some possible solutions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...moral judgment is not as important as a leaders ability to maintain the respect of thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 443, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...der, but that does not mean that he/she have full supermecy to take any decision or ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...ke right judgment. The organization can comprise of different types of people, many are cor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, while, as to, for instance, in fact, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2665.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93518518519 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68233245654 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418518518519 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4718079925 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.136363636 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259149273882 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927467602237 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810276018027 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172714962824 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846969237867 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.