The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three
companies over a period of 15 years.
The line graph illustrates how much waste was released by three companies between 2000 and 2015.
It is clear that the waste output of the three companies changed considerably. Both A and B companies witnessed a decrease in their amount of waste in these years, while company C’s waste output increased significantly.
In 2000, the waste production of company A was highest, at 12 tonnes, company B released around 8 tonnes and the waste output of company C produced about 4 tonnes. Over the next 5 years, there was a sharp rise in the amounts of waste of company B and C, increasing by around 2 tonnes while company A ’s waste production decreased approximately to 11 tonnes.
From 2005 to 2015, the company C cut waste output by nearly 4 tonnes. By contrast, company A and B’s waste production fell by 3 tonnes and 7 tonnes respectively over the same ten years period. By 2015, company A had reduced waste output by around 8 tonnes and the amount of waste produced by company B had dropped by 3 tonnes, company C had increased waste output by approximately 10 tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 60 | view |
| 2023-12-04 | klnhhhh01 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- Internet users as a percentage of population 1999 2009 100
- Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on television media should be restricted To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 56
- Many people think watching TV is fully bad for children Others think that TV is beneficial for their development of them Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aste output by approximately 10 tonnes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72105263158 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79414207171 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457894736842 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9319653861 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356930353104 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196341689877 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355516845398 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243490903689 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326640562263 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.