A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument
The argument concludes that the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood would be popular because of the augmented popularity in Bay City restaurants. But the conclusion of the argument is based on some assumptions like Bay City restaurants increased popularity and eating habits of people for which there is no clear evidence.
First of all, Argument presents the percentage increase in Bay City restaurants, but it should give proper evidence of the study which conducted on how many numbers of people and people from which background. If the study contains only 10 people and out of that only 3 people increased in past five years, so it will be not clear evidence of increasing popularity. It might be that study is not reliable and it could contain some type of human error so we cannot come to a perfunctory assumption that captain seafood restaurant will also be profitable. The argument should have a convincing statement by which we can come to the conclusion.
Nationwide study and the area in which Captain Seafood restaurant is based can have some difference in terms of nature of work, financial condition. It might be that people who located nearby area of captain seafood restaurant is based on mainly agriculture and their two-income families would be less than people who are in other parts of the Bay City which have IT and Industrial sectors. So we cannot assume that nationwide study would applicable to all the cities in that nation. Hence, argument should have proper evidence on the financial condition and nature of work of the people who are located nearby of Captain Seafood restaurant.
Lastly, argument does not provide any information about new Captain Seafood restaurant food quality and the location. It might be that quality and quantity they provide would bad and there is no hygiene in the restaurant, so even after providing seafood dishes, the restaurant sales would decline. There can be a chance that the waiter and manager of the restaurant are rude and talks brusquely with customers.
All in all, the argument is unpersuasive as it stands. To bolter it, argument must provide relevant facts and evidence about the reliability of Captain Seafood restaurant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-10 | Harish_07 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-03 | YACHI PATEL | 54 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | Sumilak | 58 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | parangat90 | 68 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | aggy | 59 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 60
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 66
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of fami 53
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 366 350
No. of Characters: 1821 1500
No. of Different Words: 164 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.374 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.975 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.68 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 133 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.349 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.393 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.633 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.17 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the people who are located nearby of Captain Seafood restaurant. Lastly, ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 13.6137724551 140% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 366.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07103825137 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75368632532 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445355191257 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3085453678 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.733333333 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 23.324526521 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 5.70786347227 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227275464719 0.218282227539 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878362815182 0.0743258471296 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522947533604 0.0701772020484 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139870973071 0.128457276422 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624243271613 0.0628817314937 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.