The maps below illustrate how Freton changes from 1990 to 2012.
The maps depict some changes that were made to Freton between the years 1990 and 2012.
It is noticeable that many changes were made to Freton.
In both maps, it is clear that school and library were the places that were being kept in the period shown. To the north of the maps, there were four main changes. The “playing field with tree” was demolished and then was replaced by the “blocks of flats”. Next to the “school”, while the “bank” was converted into a restaurant, the “hospital” was expanded. Besides, the “trees” were chopped down to turned into a “technopark”.
In the north of the maps, all the places were changed. Alongside the “high street”, the “flats” have appeared and the “café and park” was transformed into “hotel and golf course”. Furthermore, the “theatre” and “shops” were knocked down consecutively and replaced by the “cinema” and the “supermarket”. Finally, the “blocks of flats” were erected to replace the “houses”.
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 78
- The maps below illustrate how Freton changes from 1990 to 2012 71
- Traditional ideas from older people about the way to live and behave are not helpful to young people and their futures To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 56
- The diagrams below show the present builidng of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25105752025 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9909077131 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1818181818 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5454545455 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0913188832393 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04535124628 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103523814746 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12471592727 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139907847605 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.