The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The first pie chart demonstrates the amount of money which was earned by a children's trust and the second illustrates the expenditure in the same year.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that donated food was the major root of the income, while the government grants and the investment were the least. On the other hand, almost all cash was spent on the program services.
Regarding the revenue sectors, donated food gave 86.6 percent of the total money which was the highest of all other divisions. In this term, community contribution was in second place and contributed 10.4% of earning money. While, other sources gave only 0.4%, though it was the addition of a percentage of two other features which had the same portion that was 0.2%. From the program revenue they earned 2.2%.
Turning to the expenditure, program services cost 95.8% of total outlaid money. In addition, for raising the fund the charity paid 2.6% of their expenditure budget, while they cost only 1.6 percent for management and general purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-09 | nemcutehotme | view | |
| 2022-02-04 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | TUAN MINH | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-14 | asmita acharya | 87 | view |
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some peopel think that one world government is better than national governments Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt for management and general purposes.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, regarding, second, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98843930636 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45793233992 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2105569333 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8888888889 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0907484316372 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397503317038 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523308136891 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694200531086 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662160547546 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.