Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
I am taking the opposite side of the statement that science and technology will solve all the societys problem.
Science has done many favours to us. It have enabled us to do many works faster and efficiently. But It also has created many problem. Like in many social platforms it many abusive comments in increasing day by day. With the faster internet many pepole can talk with his or her loved ones. But unfortunately many pornography are spreading with the help of faster internet. People are also busy with the digital device thus isolating them from their family. This is creating depressive problem among young generations. Many school colleges are going online with the help of technology. So students need to stare at screen for a long time. While staring ate screen long times creates eye problem. Many cyber crimes are increasing rapidly.
As many probelms are arising so authorites are coming up with many solution to tackle these problems but also many problems are also arising on the other side.
So it can be concluded that though science and technology can solve many of our scoceity problems it also has some side effects. So science and technology will always not be able to cure all societys problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...Science has done many favours to us. It have enabled us to do many works faster and ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...nd efficiently. But It also has created many problem. Like in many social platforms it many ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pornography seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much pornography', 'a good deal of pornography'.
Suggestion: much pornography; a good deal of pornography
...is or her loved ones. But unfortunately many pornography are spreading with the help of faster i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 639, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eed to stare at screen for a long time. While staring ate screen long times creates e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun solution seems to be countable; consider using: 'many solutions'.
Suggestion: many solutions
...rising so authorites are coming up with many solution to tackle these problems but also many ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 2235.4752809 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 208.0 442.535393258 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91346153846 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.55969084622 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48231540963 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 704.065955056 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4920663393 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.875 118.986275619 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272383289383 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102991898219 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164110714401 0.0758088955206 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25923864683 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197880891386 0.0667264976115 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 14.1392134831 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.31 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.