Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree?
The success of a company mainly depends on its employees. Therefore, the corporation should be painstaking while recruiting employees as well as making appropriate contracts, which leads to the question of whether businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. I totally concur with the idea that companies should retain their workers in the long term due to some rational reasons.
First of all, needless to say, that it is much more economical to train old workers than young ones. Obviously and normally, trainees are amazed by the new work and environment, which must take a long time for those people to familiarize themselves with their job. As a result, the company must spend some expenditures to train those new workers. On the contrary, intellectual capital is one of the elements of old workers that the new ones do not possess. The older the workers get, the more acquaintances and skills that they can learn such as leadership, management, solving problems, and improvisation. For example, out of the young and physically strong workers who apply to the company, the boss still chooses my father- a senior- to stay inasmuch as my father has so much business experience as well as he is close to the boss’s style of work.
Secondly, the loyalty of the “grey workers” is all a company needs. The company can never grasp the new workers’ future decision, specifically they will stay with the company forever or they will take all the privileges that are given by the company and leave. In fact, there are many organizations that are at loss now that they invest in the disloyal. On the other hand, a company can believe in older workers’ alliances because of psychological factors, which states that seniors prefer a stable life with constant income rather than an alternative life. Furthermore, once the old settle down and adhere to a certain company, the alliance may drive those people to protect the company’s secret. To sum up, a company should guarantee that its employees will not betray them or reveal confidential documents.
In conclusion, high experience and loyalty are needed elements that lead an employer to the decision of holding back their old workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-06 | quanjun | 90 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | neilyuan | 76 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | Rustin_Panda | 86 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | wally | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | WatermelonUCLA | 60 | view |
- The chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of them be 78
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...g appropriate contracts, which leads to the question of whether businesses should hire employees for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05191256831 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78605607509 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0530026836 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5625 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 5.45110844103 243% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145370036898 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442497170493 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815938561061 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102455604393 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103123503259 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.