.E-Books are for beneficial banks the physical books. It has been argued that despite enhance the range of paper books, libraries have to concentrate to ameliorate the electronic version of books. I am in the form of agreement because ebooks not only saves space but also provide the latest version of books.
The first and foremost reason to Amplifier ebooks in libraries is that technological resources help to save a lot of space. Instead of enlarged the collection of paper books for required and Thomas space and booksellers to store it, ebooks are quite a convenient option. Consequently, individuals can carry ebooks on computers or mobile phones whenever they want.
The second prominent reason for holding the view is bad electronics books can update frequently. This enables readers to have access to the latest information which cannot be possible in physical books for stock as a result, people can not only easily but also swiftly update their knowledge through technology which gives a chance to stay connected with the latest world.
Last but not least, having technology in the library is a much more convenient option for stop this is because people can easily search for various books with just one finger clicks and it makes the process faster. For example, a survey conducted by Cambridge University state that Technology involvement in the library saves 80% of the time of students and Library staff as a student to not have such a book in various bookshelf and stuff do not have to rearrange the books.
In conclusion, it is undoubtedly to do that libraries seem more useful when it is amplified with technology. Since ebooks save plenty of space can easily be updated and most significantly it is less time-consuming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.E-Books are for beneficial banks the phy...
^
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: E-Books
.E-Books are for beneficial banks the physical b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04482758621 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75741568509 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5584016735 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.916666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14438394033 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557468659646 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391051685726 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793952249481 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294790226558 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.