It is true that, in this contemporary era, where, masses introspect that elderly people are enjoying their better life rather than past. However, a number of individuals contemplate that getting old is not a superior thing. According to my perspective, advantages are being taken by them due to technologies.
To commence with, older people can do work in any age or generate money because they have internet from where they can easily acquire new knowledge without discussing with anyone. Another reason could be, elderly people have to confront plethora of problems like, diabetes, asthma, blood pressure, and so on. Moreover, treatment could be easily taken by them in any hospital through various advance machines. Thirdly, they could easily talk with robots and watch everything on YouTube or on social media. To exemplify, according to a survey, it can be manifested that good facilities are being taken by more than 68% elderly people in all over the world. Additionally, it is still escalating day by day as compared to past.
Looking at the other view, work cannot be done effectively by old-age people because they do not have much potential to do any work as young generation. That is why after loosing their job sometimes they start feeling blue or depressed. Secondly, in the past, elderly people used to spend lots of time with their families but right now younger people are bussy in their own work. Thus, they are suffering from some problems. Thirdly, some are not able to survive in today's era. For example, elderly people are having to face some issues while using these phones because still they are addicted to landline phones.
On a concluding note, undoubtedly, being old, it is not an easy task but it is natural process that is why people have to face some diffculties in their life yet, we must understand that due to advance technologies, their life span has increased as well as they are living peacefully.
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching With the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be done online Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that new houses should be built in the same style as older houses in the local area Others disagree and say that local authorities should allow people to build houses in the style s of their own choice Discuss both view and give your own 78
- Some think that students must travel to another country in order to learn its language and customs To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- One of the most important issues facing the world todays is a shortage of food and some think genetically modified foods are a possible solution To what extend do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for example, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96319018405 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60852373973 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6022305214 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163559797616 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516093929812 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420471896941 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103883867322 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257650300414 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for example, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96319018405 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60852373973 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6022305214 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163559797616 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516093929812 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420471896941 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103883867322 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257650300414 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.