It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to natural areas such as South Pole. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
With the advanced optimization of the modern world, discovering isolated natural places is nothing impossible for millions of scientists and tourists. Despite its considerable benefits, I strongly believe that the potential downsides would eclipse the foreseeable upsides.
One of the main advantages of travelling to unpopulated areas is that these regions offer visitors ample opportunities to seek valuable experiences. While reaching tourist destinations which boast spectacular sceneries and lavish services seems fairly common, exploring wild sites including South Pole and Amazon forest allows many of them to expose to exotic natural features and phenomena of diverse habitats. As a result, this would be one of the most memorable and exhilarating journeys that tourists and scientists have ever undergone. At the same time, these remote environments could be a rewarding adventure for many inquisitive and intrepid travellers as they would have unfettered scopes to gain insights into the biodiversity of flora and fauna in primitive forests such as those in the Amazon or natural phenomena of ice in South Pole. Such knowledge may be unacquirable for common tourists, making the experience even more unique and unforgettable.
Notwithstanding all that, i am convinced that certain problems resulting from this should be taken into sober account. From an objective perspective, the preparation for the exploration of these far-flung regions is demanding. It costs thousands of tourists and scientists, for example, a staggering amount of money to travel to south pole or amazon forest, let alone equip themselves with various essential kits to reside in the areas for a length of time. Consequently, without meticulous calculation, those journeys would take a heavy toll on their finance. And due to what they entail, such discoveries are only affordable for financially-advantaged people. Furthermore, the process of exploring remote natural places is perilous. For instance, travellers would have to encounter attack from wild animals in the Amazon forest or suffer from the cold spell of South Pole. More importantly, such environments are often bereft of services to cater for tourists and scientists. Hence, it stands to reason that many of their lives could possibly be under constant threats.
In conclusion, although what isolated natural environments have to offer are an appeal to travel seekers, I think that risks that they have to incur are extremely potential based on aforementioned arguments.
- Some people think that money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe that they should be free to do what they want Discuss both view and give your own opinions 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to natural areas such as South Pole Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rgettable. Notwithstanding all that, i am convinced that certain problems resu...
^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ntial kits to reside in the areas for a period of time. Consequently, without meticulous calcu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'entail'
Suggestion: entail
... on their finance. And due to what they entails, such discoveries are only affordable f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...such discoveries are only affordable for financially-advantaged people. Furthermo...
^^
Line 5, column 1036, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ands to reason that many of their lives could possibly be under constant threats. In conclu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... offer are an appeal to travel seekers, i think that risks that they have to incu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, may, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57368421053 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12390036054 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586842105263 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3205798375 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.588235294 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301339917782 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836214473814 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569804322452 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156867012622 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862284131357 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.