The bar chart displays four different ways people in a European city used to commute in 1960, 1980, and 2000.
Overall, the percentage of workers traveled by cars increased dramatically over the period, whereas the proportions of cyclists and those who went on foot decreased significantly. There was a fluctuation in the proportion of bus users over the three periods.
In 1960, the lowest percentage of commuters used their cars with just over 5%, then the figure rose to just under a quarter and around two-fifths, the highest proportion, in 1980 and 2000, respectively. In 1960, around 18% of people used buses to commute; after that, the percentage increased to just above a fifth in 1980. Then, the figure declined to about 15% by 2000.
The highest percentage of commuters walked in 1960 with nearly 35%, but this value constantly declined to just under a tenth in 2000, four times lower than the percentage of car users. The proportion of people who rode to work witnessed a constant reduction from a quarter in 1960 to a fifth and approximately 5% in 1980 and 2000, respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010
- Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007 and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Make comparison where relevant 78
- Line graph number of visitors per month in summer 2013 In thousands 86
- Some people say that physical education classes are an important part of a child s education Others believe that it is more important to focus on academics during school time Discuss both these views and give your opinion 82
- The map below shows three proposed sites for a new hypermarket A B and C in the city of Pellington 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... declined to just under a tenth in 2000, four times lower than the percentage of ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93513513514 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83118396252 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8362807308 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134243209925 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635056785455 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625960634727 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979577995332 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714195795841 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.