The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education center in the year 2009.
The provided graphics demonstrate the quantity of both males and females ranging from under 20 to over 50 who participated in numerous additional evening courses at an education center for adults in the year 2009.
A first glance at the column chart reveals that drama, painting, and language courses gained more popularity in females than that of sculpture courses. In addition to this, it is striking to observe that while the seniors aged 50 or over registered the highest number of participants, this statistic in the group of teenagers held the least.
As is shown in the chart, the number of females partaking in drama doubled that of males with 20 and ten respectively. Likewise, with regard to the language program, there were 40 women, which is two-fold in the total participants of men. Moreover, 5 people more women chose to attend to painting course than the others. However, the sculpture is the only category in which men dominated the majority with 10 people.
Turning to the other details of the pie chart, it is manifest that the number of joiners is directly proportional to age. Specifically, nearly two-fifths of this educational center' members are seniors aged 50 and above, exhibiting the highest figure than all the other categories given. Additionally, the quantity of groups 40-49, 30-39, 20-29, and teenagers is respectively 26%, 16%, 11%, and one in twenty.
- Children engaged in paid work 73
- The line graph below provide information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003 2005 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'categories'' or 'category's'?
Suggestion: categories'; category's
...g the highest figure than all the other categories given. Additionally, the quantity of gr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, moreover, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08733624454 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78621099714 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602620087336 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3720713197 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246982111022 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823382596561 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068468716886 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140109271924 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745660026766 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.