To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
[Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.]
The speaker asserts that to be an effective leader, it is necessary that a public official must hold the highest moral and ethical standards. Although the higher moral and ethical standards could not directly indicates that an officer have ability to manage a country, the first condition being a leader is having highest ethical and moral standards; Thus, I strongly agree with the speaker.
To begin with, leaders must hold the highest ethical and moral standards, because they have social obligation. Leaders have to regard the public interests as first priority rather than personal interests; And they should not sacrifice public interests because of personal interests. The African conflict is an example; For personal interest, Africa’s leaders launch many brutal wars in Africa without minding victims. If leaders lose the ethical and moral standards, their countries are incapable of operating normally. In a word, leaders must maintain the highest moral and ethical standards in order to fulfill their responsibility.
Secondly, leaders holding the highest moral and ethical standards will facilitate development of country well, since they plan the country’s development in the long run. In the process of planning project, they consider the overall situation, because the high ethical and moral standards indicates they can consider other’s feeling. For example, Obama, who has no negative evaluation, is a greatness leader; In his presidency, he addressed the global financial crisis and included a major stimulus package, including legislation to reform health care and a major financial regulation reform bill, and the end of a major US military presence In Iraq. In sum, leaders who the highest moral and ethical standards can make country stable developing.
On the other hand, Considering from a short-term, moral and ethical standards is the basis that people select a leader, and is the premise of being a leader. In the election, voters evaluate the candidates’ ability based on candidates’ ethical and moral standards. If candidates lose the baseline of the moral and ethical standards, they will lose the probability of becoming a leader. Hillary Clinton email controversy is an example; This band news from Clinton had decreased average lead in the polls. As a result, she lose the probability of becoming a leader. In brief, moral and ethical standards is the base that voters select a leader.
To sum up, leaders must hold the highest moral and ethical standards, because they have social responsibility; leaders having high moral and ethical standards will make country developing well in the long run; moral and ethical standards is the foundation that voters select a leader. With these reasoning, I totally agree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | nipuntestbig | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | ajay@123 | 62 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | idris oriyomi | 54 | view |
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'could' requires base form of the verb: 'indicate'
Suggestion: indicate
...nd ethical standards could not directly indicates that an officer have ability to manage...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndards could not directly indicates that an officer have ability to manage a coun...
^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
..., the first condition being a leader is having highest ethical and moral standards; Thus, I st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'loses'.
Suggestion: loses
...age lead in the polls. As a result, she lose the probability of becoming a leader. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in brief, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39588100686 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76378296913 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45766590389 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4724907862 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.105263158 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287719523586 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115730354822 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780977530204 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198957552644 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620545298665 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.