The bar graph demonstrates the measurement of the manufacturing capacity of oil of six different Gulf countries from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that all countries had shown a similar trend that was increasing except in Qatar. Among the countries, Saudi Arabia was in first place in terms of production all around the periods, while Qatar was in last.
According to the graph, in 1990, Saudi Arabia produced over 8 million barrels per day which were far higher than others, while Iran and UAE were able to manufacture over 2 million. The capability of the other two countries was 2 million barrels per day. After five years, every country upgraded their production but not more than 0. 5 million barrels each day, whereas UAE could not raise their productivity.
In 2005, Saudi Arabia's production changed significantly, it climbed to almost 13 and after five years it went to 15 million barrels per day. In these two consecutive periods, the amount of manufacture was not increased for Iran and Qatar, while their production was 4 and 1 million respectively. In the case of the other three countries, the production rose but the amount was almost the same, and they produced 3 and 3. 7 million barrels per day in these two years respectively.
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 82
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ction was 4 and 1 million respectively. In the case of the other three countries, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88990825688 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74060207909 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8075180966 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9090909091 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114264713323 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530671824267 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646671989563 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100871765431 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843992182337 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.