Governments around the world spend too much money on treating illnesses and diseases and not enough on health education and prevention. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
I agree that government should spending more cost on health promotion and prevention than illnesses treatment. By doing this, more and more people can improve their health habits and empower communities.
Firstly, future health development budgets should be more focus on promoting and preventing disease rather than on curing it. Moreover, health education efforts must be on reinforcing behavior, not on teaching medical science. Government should make health education programs during the COVID-19 pandemic, as a result more people change their new normal lifestyles. Indonesia program concentrated on setting up hundreds of sites that were open both days and evenings to give whole information about COVID-19 such as virus characteristics, vaccination, and how to prevent COVID-19 like wearing a face mask and washing of hands. The effort was supported by mass media coverage and the involvement of community.
Secondly, Health promotion and prevention interventions help communities to increase control over the factors that define health and this strategy can provide guidance to communities facing the challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic. The expertise of health promotors with creating healthy settings can be a source of inspiration and support for schools, universities and workplaces that have to deal with the longer-term disruptive effects of the pandemic. For example, in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19, schools might impose regulations requiring students to study at home during the pandemic, decreasing cases among student.
In conclusion, money spend on promotion of healthy lifestyles and the prevention of ill health being better than cure, strengthening the organizations and improving their health behavior. I believe, this are the best way to manage our health system and reduce morbidity rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-12 | ivantran | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | fatimatuzzahro | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the weight assessment of inhabitants of Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of self employed workers of the total workforce in five countries in 1998 and 2008 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It has been proposed that citizens should only consume food and drink products that have been produced in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph gives information about drinking habits of the US population by age 67
- Percentage participation of men in Senior development position 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68613138686 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95857344021 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7059926268 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216524773964 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855999557196 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625882318254 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147816537092 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494292746213 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.