In this cutting-edge era, growth in cities as well as in populations are rapidly increasing and for the higher authorities and it is a cumbersome task to control this rapid growth. As consequence, natural beauty spots are losing by many countries because they do not protect those wonderful places. If the government protect these places so, in the upcoming time, we can receive a lot of benefits. I will discuss the benefits alongside give the appropriate method to protect natural spots.
To begin with, although the development of cities is a positive thing for the growth of the economy, it jeopardizes the natural sites. Today, in many nations governments making various laws for protecting these locations, still, those nations are losing their natural places. If we give the more attention to protect these natural beauty spots as a result, in future we can recieve several advantages. One of the major benefits is that natural places are extremely essential to reduce environmental issues. To explicate, in the natural places a lot of plants and trees grown, and they reduce the air pollution, maintain the water level as well as reduce the soil pollution. For instance, today in many countries' government makes hard and fast rule related to the natural places. Researchers claim that in those countries environmental problems are immensely less rather than those nations who losing their natural places. Government must make strict laws to protect those sites such as no one can do the construction work nearby the natural places and many more.
Moreover, these places having a lot of financial benefits. Natural beauty spots are the centre of attraction for tourists. In other words, most visitors love to visit natural beauty locations. If the nations protect their natural location so more people visit those places and they generate revenue for the government. Take recent research as an example, According to recent research, many tourists visit India because in India there are a lot of natural places and every year thousands of tourists visit those locations. Indian government collect the huge amount of fund though those natural places.
To conclude, natural beauty sites have several benefits not only for the environment but also for the national economy. Despite the government made numerous laws in order to protect natural beauty places, these locations are not secure and people distroy these places. So, authorities should be paid more attention and protect these wonderful locations.
- Some people think that the government should give money to creative people such as artists and musicians To what extent do you agree 73
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 78
- some people think that newspaper are the best media to learn and get information from while others believe that the internet is a better source discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company What can companies do to increase staff productivity 73
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefit that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... pollution. For instance, today in many countries government makes hard and fast rule rel...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25310173697 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64711123245 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473945409429 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3548893065 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.80952381 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1904761905 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362718259177 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122651465098 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576884258728 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246082574157 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547313194273 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... pollution. For instance, today in many countries government makes hard and fast rule rel...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25310173697 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64711123245 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473945409429 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3548893065 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.80952381 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1904761905 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362718259177 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122651465098 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576884258728 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246082574157 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547313194273 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.