With increasing population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty? How can this be solved?
The rapid increase in term of people's number leads to a great demand in creating urban centers on existent unpopulated areas such as natural beauty spots. The human habitat extension has destroyed many green places for a long time. From my perspective, I consider that preservation of natural beauty spots can be an escape from worst effects generated by pollution.
Admittedly, the natural beauty has brought enormous benefits for existent life on the Earth. Obviously, the green environment has defended the excess of dioxide carbon which is harmful to several creatures. Unfortunately, human activities, for example burning the fossil fuels, have generated a huge amount of dioxide carbon more than ever happened naturally on the Earth. That is why, our planet is not capable of recycling immediately this gas accumulation. The more destructive plans of natural beauty occur in our society, the more carbon dioxide will remain in the atmosphere. It is important to keep the carbon recycle mechanics in touch with our existent population and future generation.
The solution to this issue is related to the human dimension regarding space. A good idea is to concentrate the population in the existent urban centers, offering better services and facilities. To exemplify, this solution means a better space management in private and community ownership. A counter argument is that everyone will be constrained related to how large their household are. Another solution is promoting the eco-friendly building standards: underground and tree houses. It ensures that there will not bring any radical modifications on the natural beauty spots. The negative aspect is that these houses are not very secure. The underground dwellings are often treated by floods, whereas, the tree-houses by the wind. A further solution consists of colonisation of other planets around the Earth, but it is revolutionary because of the difficulty in creating human comfort in those hostile areas.
After boxing of this issue, in this contemporary world, I consider that advantages of natural beauty spots should remain for our future generations. I am convicted that overpopulation will be solved once the time is passed.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2015-12-24 | pratik_dkr1 | 85 | view |
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 50
- With the rise in popularity of the Internet newspapers will soon become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 80
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century. The map below shows the development of the village.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of the village. 80
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative impact on young people s reading and writing skills Do you agree or disagree 70
- In a vote that took place at the International Astronomical Union Conference on August 24th 2006 Pluto lost its status as a planet in our solar system Pluto was originally discovered in 1930 when scientists were searching for something that was interferin 80
is not capable of recycling immediately this gas accumulation.
is not capable of recycling this gas accumulation immediately .
Sentence: The rapid increase in term of people's number leads to a great demand in creating urban centers on existent unpopulated areas such as natural beauty spots.
Error: unpopulated Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.887 7.5 //"Sentence Length SD is low" means that the essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentences varieties wanted.
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07 //try this pattern to have higher Coherence:
paragraph 1: introduction. Your ideas/opinions here.
paragraph 2: Admittedly, there are some advantages of side A. First, ... Second, ...
paragraph 3: However, still I support side B. reason 1 + why reason 1 + example for reason 1 + a small conclusion for reason 1.
paragraph 4: In addition, reason 2 + why reason 2 + example for reason 2+ a small conclusion for reason 2.
paragraph 5: conclusion.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 345 350
No. of Characters: 1817 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.31 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.267 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.847 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.887 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.272 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.458 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5