With increasing population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty? How can this be solved?
The rapid increase in term of people's number leads to a great demand in creating urban centers on existent unpopulated areas such as natural beauty spots. The human habitat extension has destroyed many green places for a long time. From my perspective, I consider that preservation of natural beauty spots can be an escape from worst effects generated by pollution.
Admittedly, the natural beauty has brought enormous benefits for existent life on the Earth. Obviously, the green environment has defended the excess of dioxide carbon which is harmful to several creatures. Unfortunately, human activities, for example burning the fossil fuels, have generated a huge amount of dioxide carbon more than ever happened naturally on the Earth. That is why, our planet is not capable of recycling immediately this gas accumulation. The more destructive plans of natural beauty occur in our society, the more carbon dioxide will remain in the atmosphere. It is important to keep the carbon recycle mechanics in touch with our existent population and future generation.
The solution to this issue is related to the human dimension regarding space. A good idea is to concentrate the population in the existent urban centers, offering better services and facilities. To exemplify, this solution means a better space management in private and community ownership. A counter argument is that everyone will be constrained related to how large their household are. Another solution is promoting the eco-friendly building standards: underground and tree houses. It ensures that there will not bring any radical modifications on the natural beauty spots. The negative aspect is that these houses are not very secure. The underground dwellings are often treated by floods, whereas, the tree-houses by the wind. A further solution consists of colonisation of other planets around the Earth, but it is revolutionary because of the difficulty in creating human comfort in those hostile areas.
After boxing of this issue, in this contemporary world, I consider that advantages of natural beauty spots should remain for our future generations. I am convicted that overpopulation will be solved once the time is passed.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2021-08-09 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
2015-12-24 | pratik_dkr1 | 85 | view |
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility? What are you opinion on this? 60
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? 70
- Some people claim that what people eat in many Western countries is unhealthy and their diet is getting worse. Critics say that these countries should change their diet.What are your opinion on this? 60
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of employed persons by job type and sex for Australia in the year 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 85
is not capable of recycling immediately this gas accumulation.
is not capable of recycling this gas accumulation immediately .
Sentence: The rapid increase in term of people's number leads to a great demand in creating urban centers on existent unpopulated areas such as natural beauty spots.
Error: unpopulated Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.887 7.5 //"Sentence Length SD is low" means that the essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentences varieties wanted.
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07 //try this pattern to have higher Coherence:
paragraph 1: introduction. Your ideas/opinions here.
paragraph 2: Admittedly, there are some advantages of side A. First, ... Second, ...
paragraph 3: However, still I support side B. reason 1 + why reason 1 + example for reason 1 + a small conclusion for reason 1.
paragraph 4: In addition, reason 2 + why reason 2 + example for reason 2+ a small conclusion for reason 2.
paragraph 5: conclusion.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 345 350
No. of Characters: 1817 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.31 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.267 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.847 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 145 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.887 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.272 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.458 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.029 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5