Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
We are human beings and we can not live without friends. Choosing new friends over old friends is always difficult, however, in my view, I think keeping old friends is more important. Old friends know very well about me and sometimes making new friends can be waste of time.
First, old is gold. They know about my ins and outs as they are my childhood friends. Old can understand our bad situation in such a way that nobody can. For example, a few months ago my father was died because of covid-19, I was heartbroken very much. Then some of my old friends who are friends when we were in high school came to me, and give their valuable time to me to get rid of the loss. Now, I can give them heartful thanks for their unselfish support. I easily started my normal life after few days. They could help me because they know me well. That's why I can not think of making new friends over my old buddy.
Second, making new friends can be a waste of time. In this modern social media age, people love to engage in social media than in real friends. For instance, for my one-month intern in a city named Khulna, I lived there and every day in the evening I spent some time with the local boys. A few days later, I discovered that some of them are related to drugs. Then I realized that making new friends, it can not always bring good outcome, sometimes bad can be happened and it costs time and also life.
In conclusion, thus with the above in mind, in the long run, promoting the idea that keeping old friends over new friends will lead to the betterment of all involved because of the risk of making new friends in a new place and old is gold.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 75 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 58
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of video rental stores In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten video rental stores Since we are famous fo 67
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfal 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... very much. Then some of my old friends who are friends when we were in high school cam...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ould help me because they know me well. Thats why I can not think of making new frien...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29166666667 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16838944936 2.67179642975 81% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509615384615 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.610135373 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3888888889 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223727369411 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763004416219 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916105360191 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17620099008 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838826934764 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.31 10.9000537634 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.45 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 86.8835125448 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.