The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation

Essay topics:

The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.

The two given maps illustrate the changes of a resident hall from 2010 to now.
In general, the hall’s layout has become significantly different, with the appearance of a parking area and the disappearance of a living room.
In 2010, the building was a relatively green area with three gardens to the north, to the south, and to the north-west. However, only the north garden remains while the other two were replaced by a new student-bedroom in the north-west and a car park in the south. In addition, there is an increase in the number of student bedrooms, specifically from the original three to five, replacing the former living room to the north.
Moreover, the current building is also more accessible with more doors added which connect the rooms and hallway. Furthermore, the kitchen in the east is now expanded to use as a social area. One significant change includes the introduction of an en-suite room which is easy to be reached from the main entrance. Lastly, at the heart of the map, the big bathroom stays unchanged during the period of time.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-21 nobitaa 73 view
2024-12-20 khanhkhanhlhp 78 view
2024-12-11 nguyendangquang.aspect 11 view
2024-12-08 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-11-29 Nguyen Thinh 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...big bathroom stays unchanged during the period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81420765027 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81803019081 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617486338798 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3278861866 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.057955052047 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233456559706 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026538004141 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0341204424712 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023743777546 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.