Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
has this become a positive or negative development?
It is said that these days with the advent of technology the communication among people has changed. In this essay I will outline the affected ways of making relationships and I will argue why I strongly believe this is a positive step forward.
Technology has brought new onset methods of communications. Today’s individuals are experiencing new way of remote interaction which are completely straight forward and facilitated. Virtual communication is one of these new types of interaction that people talk to each other by using the internet. They spend hundreds of hours sharing their idea without visiting each other in person and in the real world. They argue about everything and they even fall in love without any experience of real interaction. In addition, technology leads to reviving old relationships. Friends who are living in other countries can easily find their childhood friends in the internet.
Although it might have some disadvantages, and some people believe that this kind of interacting is very demanding, it has improved people’s lives. It helps people to work in the most remote area without any concern about homesickness. For example, an individual is able to immigrate to other continents in order to find an appropriate job opportunity while at any time he can have a video call with his family. Furthermore, it may help people with social phobia disorder to interact with other people without any needs to visit them in person. Besides, it opens a great number of job opportunities for them.
In conclusion, technology creates new methods of relationships and improves the older ones. I believe that because of its countless advantages, it is a positive progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | SharmisthaNaskar | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-10 | Surbhithegirl | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-24 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | mahyarr | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | tranvanngoc | 61 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 84
- You have seen an advertisement in an English newspaper for a job working in the City Museum shop during the holidays You decide to apply for the job Write a letter to the director of the Museum In your letter introduce yourself explain what experience and 73
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world with serious results for the environment What do you think can be done to solve this problem 89
- being a celebrity such as a famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 581, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'jobs'?
Suggestion: jobs
...on. Besides, it opens a great number of job opportunities for them. In conclusion,...
^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'positive progress'.
Suggestion: positive progress
...ause of its countless advantages, it is a positive progress.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19636363636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06196933335 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578181818182 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3457879793 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332880936128 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928403066038 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640001626166 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190003453301 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578484132875 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.