In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The claim states that in any field the beginner is most likely to make greater contribution than the expert. Both beginner and the expert posses the same fundamental knowledge of the particular subject they are working on. The difference in contribution lies in the extent of experience one posses. The author’s claim might look convincing but needs more scrutiny.
In any field, beginner possesses the freedom of breaking the norms by providing a different outlook towards a particular problem. Whereas the expert, who has years of experience is accustomed to the conventional approach and may have a narrow outlook towards the problem. The probability that a problem is solved either by an expert or by a beginner is equally the same.
Looking at the example of Warren Buffet who is one of the richest person in the world. The reason for this being is his experience that he has gained over the course of time. This is also the same cause that he became the richest person in his late 60s. In this example the experience is the main factor which made Warren Buffet succeed in his life.
But on the contrary, Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of the facebook, joined the same list of richest person at quite a young age. This was because of his unconventional approach and the passion to do something different from others. Today’s generation displays mettle by taking risks and are fast-paced. The determinant factor for Zuckerberg’s success was his care-free attitude and iconoclastic approach.
To sum it up, the author’s statement is quite partisan. The important contributions can be made by anyone, an expert or a beginner. The important thing is that the contribution should be driven by unorthodox means and should arise from the experience that is needed to calculate the risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 50
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one poss', 'one posse', 'a poss', 'a posse', or simply 'posses'?
Suggestion: one poss; one posse; a poss; a posse; posses
...bution lies in the extent of experience one posses. The author’s claim might look convinc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the richest'.
Suggestion: of the richest
...r of the facebook, joined the same list of richest person at quite a young age. This was b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that is needed to calculate the risks.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, whereas, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04013377926 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84956113423 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528428093645 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4007575649 60.3974514979 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7222222222 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156691575434 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048527110658 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542854706334 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828390922165 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568710128067 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.