The bar chart illustrate information about the compare s smuggle earning in billions of dollars from five kinds of product categories in the year between 2015 and 2016, while the table represents the changes in ratio of products values in the year from 2015 to 2016.
Overall, it can be seen that the petroleum product was the highest amount of earning from transport. Secondly, the engineered goods was the highest amount of earning from dump. The textile was the highest percentage of product's values.
To begin with, it can be seen that the year in 2016, petroleum product was highest expect earning at about 62 billion dollars. The year in 2015, textiles products were the same expect earning at about 31 billion dollars. The unique thing is that the year in 2016, gems and jewelry product was dropping dump earning at around 40 billion dollars on the contrary other four products was rising smuggle earning. However, the textiles marked the highest percentage of product's values at around 15. 24%. The agriculture product marked lowest percentage of values at about 0. 81%
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The Bar chart shows the top ten countries for production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by select the main features and make comparisons when relevant
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 70
- Some people think the government should focus on improving the economy of the country Other people think the government should focus on social services such as health and education programs Which statement do you agree with Explain and provide examples to 78
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, secondly, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98895027624 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40561901363 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475138121547 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6380583388 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131472054179 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062010831887 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744792720206 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116929157646 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106466797098 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.