In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasis that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It has been argued that these days companies insist on presenting that their companies’ outputs are new in some way. In this essay I will outline the reason for this concept and elaborate why I strongly believe it is a negative progression.
The most important reason for this strategy is that by this idea the companies attract more people’s attention to the new products. They target this notion that people almost always want to buy new eye-catching products, so they introduce a new one with a negligible change while this intangible change has been bold in its commercial. These businesses have repeatedly done this method to attract more individuals to their new products and it is completely effective.
Companies deliberately never introduce a perfect product because they want to have a potential to change and improve their outputs. For example, a company just produces a compact laptop with an ineffective battery in order to oblige customers to buy the next model with better battery capacity in the following years. Furthermore, some mobile phone producers just introduce their new products without any practical change. For instance, Apple’s company has been representing the same mobile phones without any hardware change for 4 years while the only difference among them is the colour. In addition, this strategy leads to increasing the fake need. These dysfunctional changes which are dominantly demonstrated in the advertisements can cause consumerism. For example, a state of the art washing machine with a WIFI connection is not a functional development but it can attract people who are already having a good washing machine, to buy and try this unnecessary option.
In conclusion, the reason for emphasizing that the recent outputs of companies are new, is attracting more people to these recent products and absolutely it is not a positive development because these new ones have unnecessary changes which increase fake need.
- You are working for a company You need to take some time off work and want to ask your manager about this Write a letter to your manager In your letter explain why you want to take time off work give details of the amount of time you need suggest how your 73
- You are looking for a part time job at a football club Write a letter to the manager of the football club In your letter introduce yourself explain what experience and special skills you have tell him her when you think you could start
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people s lives Others think that adult life brings more happiness in spite of greater responsibilities Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasis that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- During a recent plane journey you sat next to a businessman who owns a chain of restaurants You talked to him and he suggested that you should contact him about a possible job in one of his restaurants Write a letter to this businessman In your letter rem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... believe it is a negative progression. The most important reason for this strat...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oducts and it is completely effective. Companies deliberately never introduce a...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o buy and try this unnecessary option. In conclusion, the reason for emphasizin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9269946053 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.189685893 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227368392061 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898442611127 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632542374855 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155261150399 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475202193303 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.