The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line graphs illustrate the change in the ozone hole area over the 20 years of time starting from 1980 as well as the production of three responsible gases for ozone layer depletion withing the same time period.
Discussing the size of ozone hole, it was at about 400 thousand sq km in 1980. The dramatic increase was noticed in the first 10 years by the 1600 thousand amount. After having a decline in next three year (1000 sq km), the area of hole started growing again between 1993 and 2000. Finally, at the end of mentioned time amount reached at nearly 3.9 million square km.
Analzing the data of another chart, the amount of CFC - 11 stood at about 70 million tonnes in the starting 3 years. After that it was steadily down and fall at less than 10 million tonnes in the 2000. On the other hand, gradual climb was seen in the case of CFC - 12 from beggining to end, which was about 30 million to slight less than 50 million tonnes. where, the crossing point of both the gases is 40 million in 1989. N2O was not generated untill 1990, than after contineous linear upward trend taken by this gas and surpassed CFC - 11 in 1994. Surprisingly, at finishing time, parmount position was occupied by the CFC - 12 and N2O was second highest with the scale of nearby 30 million.
Overall, an upward trend was created by the area of ozone hole and in the next graph, a downfall was in CFC - 11; while, in remaining both gases an ascending flow was there.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
... to slight less than 50 million tonnes. where, the crossing point of both the gases i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to slight less than 50 million tonnes. where, the crossing point of both the gases i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...989. N2O was not generated untill 1990, than after contineous linear upward trend ta...
^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...both gases an ascending flow was there.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, well, while, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43656716418 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23743268192 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8431547932 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0833333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152496327419 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609690134109 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771159646923 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126670800403 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794976812514 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.