TPO56
Profile picture for user mahi22
Submitted by mahi22on Sun, 08/15/2021 - 05:14
In this set of materials, both the reading and the lecturer discuss a new sound produces by a special whale; hence, scientists named this whale a 52-hertz whale. Although the reading provides three theories to explains this phenomenon, the speaker refutes these ideas through several reasons, which will be described in this report.
To start off, the passage points out that two different kinds of whales produce a kid that scientists name a hybrid. The hybrid gains some characteristics from a parent, and produce this sound. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the migration pattern of the 52-hertz whale is too unusual. He explains that a hybrid also follows their parent migration pattern, and they travel together. Nevertheless, the 52-hertz whale does not migrate like other whales. When scientists follow the voice of the 52-hertz whale they understand that this whale migrates alone, and has a specific migration pattern.
Going through the next approach, the reading passage states that the 25-hertz whale may have a damaged sense of hearing, and this whale cannot listen to other whales, so produce its own sounds. However, the professor argues that having a different song cannot explain the damage to the hearing system. Because physical structure says that producing songs depend on the throw structure, and unusual throw structure cannot relate to the damage. Also, this animal does not have a connection between hearing and throw structures.
Finally, although the passage says that the 52-hertz whale would become a member of a rare species that stay alive, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that the 52-hertz whale was rare, but this whale must have parents that produce high pitch sound like their children. But, scientists use the technology for several decades that hear the sound's whales, and they never hear this kind of sound before this one.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 47 80
- TPO 42 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Profile picture for user mahi22 Submitted by mahi22on Sun, 08/15/2021 - ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tted by mahi22on Sun, 08/15/2021 - 05:14 In this set of materials, both the readi...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sounds'' or 'sound's'?
Suggestion: sounds'; sound's
...ology for several decades that hear the sounds whales, and they never hear this kind o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33544303797 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46136038356 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.725093007 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544555985949 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188263509608 0.0996497079465 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10883939447 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226872927649 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162158489972 0.0443174109184 366% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Profile picture for user mahi22 Submitted by mahi22on Sun, 08/15/2021 - ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tted by mahi22on Sun, 08/15/2021 - 05:14 In this set of materials, both the readi...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sounds'' or 'sound's'?
Suggestion: sounds'; sound's
...ology for several decades that hear the sounds whales, and they never hear this kind o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33544303797 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46136038356 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572784810127 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.725093007 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544555985949 0.272083759551 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188263509608 0.0996497079465 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10883939447 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226872927649 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162158489972 0.0443174109184 366% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.