Due to the fact that sharp popularity increasing in touristic field led to enormous problems in the environmental conditions, people began to think about alternative ways of travelling. The ecotourism is one of the excellent solutions, but today it is not explored properly. In my opinion the aforementioned type of travelling is a great perspective in the development of tourism and it may save the popular touristic zones from damages.
First of all ecotourism helps protect natural habitats and pristine environments. The condition of many countries is often depends on natural resources like forests, minerals that can be used for agriculture. Exploiting these resources often alters or destroys wildlife habitats and beautiful natural landscapes. Ecotourism allows countries to build their economies without harming the environment, where local wildlife can be in safety and visitors can enjoy untouched destinations. For example, Madagascar is a good case of ecotourism development. On the island plants and animals have always been there and cannot be seen in anywhere else. The island attracts tourists who are interested in nature and wildlife and not who wait for the noisy activities.
Moreover, visiting areas with a great natural beauty, seeing animals in their native habitats and meeting members of local communities, travelers can increase their awareness of the importance of conserving resources and avoiding waste. Also tourists can improve their understanding of other cultures and nations. For instance, since the beginning of 2000th due to the appearance of ecotourism in the one of famous Russian recreation zones, named the Lake Baikal, the quantity of inflicted damage has sharply declined.
I consider that one way to increase the popularity of ecotourism is to create some warning advertisement, which informs people about tourism harm. I believe that it can cause concernment in alternative ways of travelling, including ecotourism.
To conclude, it is my belief that nowadays ecotourism is the excellent solution in the resolve of environmental problems and it will develop in the future rapidly.
- Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults Thus it is better to learn language in childhood Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experiences 56
- Ecotourism is now defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment What are the advantages of ecotourism How can we make ecotourism more popular 73
- Ecotourism is now defined as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment What are the advantages of ecotourism How can we make ecotourism more popular 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...onserving resources and avoiding waste. Also tourists can improve their understandin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55828220859 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09436078845 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1195925777 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241376148065 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074960542629 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472114198154 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122707016499 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265051537818 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.