Admitting the same number of students of different gender in each subject is a great attempt towards equality. However, I think such an initiative will push the standard below and it is not a practical approach.
Firstly, if universities accept pupils according to their sex and based on merits, this might lead to a mismatch between selection and incompatibilities. Students with certain qualities perform well in specific subjects and by denying this we will end up with wrong selections that will effect both the system and the students in the long run. In the future-- entering the practical world-- the students might lose interest in their fields because from the beginning these were wrong paths for them. On the other hand, these fields will run into a crisis because of failing in making experts. For example: Students for whom math was not the strongest point might find it difficult to thrive in the field of Physics. In these case, both the field and the student will suffer.
Secondly, certain subjects are popular with particular gender and it shapes the reality. It is seen that certain fields are populated with particular gender where the sex of minority might find the working environment unfriendly and unwelcoming. Eventually, which might lead them to quit their jobs. For instance, newly trained male nurses may find the working place and the job inappropriate because of the very nature of the profession and the female dominance.
In contrast, if universities focus towards gender based selection, it will possibly bring some balance in the academia. However, in the long run this balance probably will not sustain because we are compromising quality over priority.
Overall, I think it is not a practical approach for universities to accept students of opposite sex equally in all subjects to address the gender issue.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... end up with wrong selections that will effect both the system and the students in the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 302.0 196.424390244 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12913907285 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71772821758 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533112582781 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1991273897 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136362814817 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471882667885 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506872197594 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865069559234 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555741582323 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.