The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph illustrates information about the use of in three different areas, and the table gives data about two country use of water. The line graph shows data about the last century in domestic, industrial, and agriculture. At the start of the twenty century, in the first five-decade, water in industrial and domestic use is around one-tenth of 1000 Km^3 although in agriculture consumption starts from 500 km3 and double after fifty years. In next fifty years, domestic use of is gradually increased about 300km3, while the use of water in industry and agriculture has dramatically increased to 1000Km3 and 3000Km3 respectively.
The table has information about two countries Brazil and Congo which has a huge difference between population and agriculture in 2000. Brazil has 176 million population and 26,500 km2 irrigated land, although congo has just 5.2 million population and 100km2 irrigated land. Water consumption per person in brazil 359m3 is much higher in comparison to congo which has 8m3. A noticeable thing is that agriculture has much more use than in other fields.
c
- The prevention of health problems and health illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 11
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2004 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has much more use than in other fields. c
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: C
... than in other fields. c
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18079096045 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8479059821 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0971174245 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395272906898 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169962220113 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172862466277 0.0843802449381 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291192062371 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110086976522 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.