Group vs self-study has been a matter of contention. Some people hold firm to the belief that learning with groups is more productive, whereas others prefer learning alone. Both viewpoints are thoroughly deliberated below.
On the one hand, diverse perspectives and teamwork skills are worth contemplating. In fact, studying in a group exposes students to different thinking and problem-solving methods, which not only enhances the outcome quality but also cultivates well-rounded minds for each member. For instance, assignment topics in universities such as psychology and society require comprehensive observation from learners and group study may benefit a lot. Besides, by studying with a lot of people, students possess chances to take part in a community thereby improving their communication skills and make sense of the real world. Even playing a role in small discussions or big projects at school will be useful hands-on experience for future work.
On the other hand, flexibility and independence are of paramount importance for self-study. Apparently, working alone means that students can do anything from their own opinion without any arguments from others, which usually leads to conflict in study groups. Also, self-paced learning offers students to work at their own pace with their strategy, plan schedule and environment. More notably, autonomy provides the chance to avoid incompetence or bad quality work from others as work in a team. In the absence of impacts, students need to have a strong awareness of their own responsibility for tasks and then can be self-motivated for better outcomes as a result.
All in all, group studying offers diverse perspectives and teamwork skills while working alone provides the opportunity for flexibility and independence. Each method has its upsides so students ought to thoroughly consider the aforementioned notion to make the right decision.
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 61
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problem and instead of increase funding into urgent and more threatening issue such as global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 95
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, if, may, so, then, well, whereas, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52218430034 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07984880664 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631399317406 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9229801181 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315138440145 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929829871409 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542726832279 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180873952557 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173644264653 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.