The bar graph demonstrates the number of people who entered into different types of clubs for leisure time activities based on two age groups in a small city.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that gardening was more popular among the old aged people, while the lowest number of young stars attended this club. On the other hand, the highest number of first aged groups joined the cycling center but the number was least for the second group.
To begin with, the gardening club, where only 25 people joined who were aged between 25-35, whereas the number of the second group was more than twice. The opposite trend was observed in the case of arts and crafts, where only 20 old people joined and for the younger group the number was 60. The photography club had the same number of people from both groups which was approximately 45.
Then turning to the other three, among these, fitness and music/dance had the same numerical value (50) for the second, in the case of the first group the difference was not more than 4. Finally, the cycling club, in this club 65 youth people attended, while only 10 old people were members of this club.
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the Internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 67
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 73
- The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, then, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6487804878 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09053844298 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9422435421 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22015377211 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113480416701 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557797622957 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157842165279 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506086564524 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.