The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph represents a differentiation of the population of people whose age over 65 from 1940 to 2040 in three different countries.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that at the beginning, the USA had the most age over 65 people, while at the end less than all other countries. The opposite trend was observed in the case of Japan.
In 1940, in the USA almost 8% of total people who had aged more than 65, in the same year, Sweden and Japan had 6% and 5% respectively. After two decades the percentage rose gradually, in the case of the USA, it increased 2% and the same for Sweden, however, in Japan, the portion decreased to 3% and up to 1990, it remained the same. From 1960 till to 1983 for both USA and Sweden the percent climbed up parallelly and stood at 15 and 13 percent respectively.
From 1990, the percentage slowly grew from 3 to 10%, after that, within 10 years the value rapidly raised to approximately 27%. Turning to the USA it decreased continuously till to 2020 to 13% then climbed up to 23%. In the case of Sweden, the percentage decreases and increases over time and ends at 25%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-04 | Parth panchal0908 | 73 | view |
2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 78
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below 78
- The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in 3 areas of a city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47572815534 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60297400188 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.854674277 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116984378142 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055925361893 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935629680814 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108416292775 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114803677563 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.