In contemporary times, sports is one of the best mediums for entertaining people such as the Olympic Games, football world a cup. The big organizations invest a lot of money in these types of sports events, therefore there is a huge opportunity for the host country to improve their economy. On the other hand, some people have dissented to this idea for various reasons. In the following paragraphs, both views will be discussed and finally, my opinion will be given.
To begin with the positive views, firstly the tourist attraction, when a big event like football or cricket world cup is held in a country people all around the world come to this place to enjoy the events. In that case, the host country has a scope to highlight their tourist attractions so that people can visit those places and it will be a great source of earning revenue currently and in the long term. For example, in Bangladesh, after hosting the 2011 T20 cricket world cup the number of foreign visitors who come here to visit the tourist places has grown significantly. In addition, it will help to decrease the unemployment rate because if the big companies have found a suitable environment for their business, then they are willing to invest in this country. For instance, according to the survey of the BBC after the 2011 cricket world cup, many sponsor companies made their branches such as VIVO mobile company, therefore, many job vacancies were created. After all, it will help to start up a new business.
On the other hand, it increases the crime rate in the city such as robbery, increasing the supply of drugs. For example, in 2008, in Pakistan, many terrorists tried to kill the Srilankan cricketer. Furthermore, people are afraid of destroying the cultural tradition due to the mixing of various cultural people.
In conclusion, to sum up, all the points above, hosting a big event creates a big opportunity for the country to progress economically and I will go with the former statement.
- The bar graph below represents the data about the clubs joined by the people of two different age groups at a leisure center Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 78
- The table below shows the expenses per week of a retired single person and a couple in Australia for their comfortable lifestyle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85588235294 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68331219948 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.76152304609 315% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7157737873 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9285714286 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208122140556 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692412399009 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511110130681 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129114684536 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904445957449 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85588235294 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68331219948 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.76152304609 315% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7157737873 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.928571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9285714286 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208122140556 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692412399009 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511110130681 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129114684536 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904445957449 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.