In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
In the contemporary era, every company wants success like leaps and bounds. To achieve this, organisation needs highly skilled, qualified and experienced employees. It is always debatable notion that insider employees should get the high position of the firm or hire new outsider employees for this designation. I vehemently accord with first statement that existing staff get the chance for this position. this essay will examine my accordance along with examples in the upcoming paragraphs.
To embark this, the chief rationalization for this agreements comes from numerous points. The most noticeable nub is honesty and experience. The commanding posts carrying plethora of responsibilities, having confidential information, and needs plenty years of experience. existing employees working in same business from last many years so somewhere they are excessive connected with that firm. Thus, that persons are honest with their workplace as they are always makes plans to obtain successful outcome for their company. For example, a survey is conducted by Harvard University in which they found that insider employees are more reliable as compare to new ones.
Furthermore, one more rational to prove my crux is culture. every firm has dissimilar culture which is sometimes difficult to adapt by new employees. Moreover, old designated workers know the needs of customers. They not only crack the deal easily but also helps to fulfillment the requirements of clients where as new hired employee takes time to understand occasionally new employees failed to acquire the projects. For instance, a research was conducted by 'times of India' that existing employees get success comfortably because of their experience and satisfactory relations with customers which helps to get the enormous projects within a few months.
To conclude this, although, some masses believe that promotions to high positions should be given to new hiring employees. I wholeheartedly disagree with this statement and explained the factors that loyalty, experience of work and customer relationship proves that these positions suitable for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Pawan Gill | 77 | view |
| 2020-09-20 | rahipatel3011 | 73 | view |
- In companies promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company and not to somebody outside the company or new hiring To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 77
- You are planning to go and study English at a school overseas You would like some information about their courses Write a letter to the school In your letter ask about the school say what kind of accommodation you want mention any special requests you hav 74
- You are planning to go and study English at a school overseas You would like some information about their courses Write a letter to the school In your letter ask about the school say what kind of accommodation you want mention any special requests you hav 85
- Should students travel Some people think that students who don t take a break in studies between a high school and a university are at disadvantage compared to students that travel and work after high school before furthering their education Do you agr 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...taff get the chance for this position. this essay will examine my accordance along ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'agreements'' or 'agreement's'?
Suggestion: agreements'; agreement's
...his, the chief rationalization for this agreements comes from numerous points. The most no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Existing
..., and needs plenty years of experience. existing employees working in same business from...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Every
...e rational to prove my crux is culture. every firm has dissimilar culture which is so...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...fulfillment the requirements of clients where as new hired employee takes time to unders...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ustomers which helps to get the enormous projects within a few months. To conc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60869565217 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97549888445 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61801242236 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5738942151 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192606531887 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555345689951 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645393452176 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122721740472 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485449240768 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.