The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005, and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The chart gives information about the proportion of students rating well for five various aspects of a university in 2000, 2005, and 2010.
Overall, the rate for print resources was always the highest over the period shown. Also, the percentage of students giving good ratings for electronic resources showed the biggest changes of the five various aspects.
In 2000, the figure for students' assessment well for print resources was 87%, comparing to 77% of buildings, 65% of teaching quality, 45% for electronic resources and the lowest was the range of modules offered with 32%. In 2005, there was a dramatic increase by 27 percent in the estimate for electronic resources, and the proportion of undergraduate good ratings for print resources slightly increased to 89%. By contrast, the period between 2000 and 2005 experienced a decrease to 30% and 63% respectively in the percentage of students giving good ratings for the range of modules offered and teaching quality. Meanwhile, the rate for teaching facilities remained stable.
In 2010, the figure for pupils’ good rates for teaching quality and electronic saw an increase by 6% and 1% separately. On the contrary, this year showed a tiny decrease in the rates for print resources and range of modules offered by 1% and 3% respectively. In the meantime, the percentage of students giving good ratings for buildings/teaching facilities continued to stay remain unaltered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-02 | Awadhesh Mourya | 78 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 77
- the importance of friendship 33
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Question 4 Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Question 4 Some people 89
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28384279476 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94248626748 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46288209607 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6530166936 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0564139827898 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336612053458 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049208981863 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062658033534 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652066521822 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.