The reading passage and the lecture are talking about using international fund protection technique to conserve forest from deforstation by industries logging. The writer claims that, this fund have several advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He belielves, all reason to protect forest are flooded.
First, the author state, international forest protection fund protect forest agriculture. Giving this fund to owners and farms will prevent logging industry and oil companies. This statement is challenged by bprofessor. He mentions, agriculyture itselef cause damage to forest more that that from industries and deforestation. Moreover, farmer try to increase growth of tree s by using new techniques and new pesticides. Pesticides will polutte water and harm forest. Therefore, international fund to agriculture can not prevent deforestation.
In addition, international fund improve economy of residents in village located in forest region, since, it will help people financialy to afford education and health services. Th lecturer refutes this point. He contends, this money will go to forest owers, who are always a governoment not to residents. In addition, there is no garauntee that governoment will spend the money to protect forest or for helping people.
Finally, the author asserts, funding re4sult in forest biodiversity and protect species from extinictios. The professor contradicts this notion. He states, increae in forest population will encourage owmers to benefit from thses trees commercialy. They try to use these plants in industries. As a ressult increase in biodiversity would not protect forest.
The reading passage and the lecture are talking about using international fund protection technique to conserve forest from deforstation by industries logging. The writer claims that, this fund have several advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. He belielves, all reason to protect forest are flooded.
First, the author state, international forest protection fund protect forest agriculture. Giving this fund to owners and farms will prevent logging industry and oil companies. This statement is challenged by bprofessor. He mentions, agriculyture itselef cause damage to forest more that that from industries and deforestation. Moreover, farmer try to increase growth of tree s by using new techniques and new pesticides. Pesticides will polutte water and harm forest. Therefore, international fund to agriculture can not prevent deforestation.
In addition, international fund improve economy of residents in village located in forest region, since, it will help people financialy to afford education and health services. Th lecturer refutes this point. He contends, this money will go to forest owers, who are always a governoment not to residents. In addition, there is no garauntee that governoment will spend the money to protect forest or for helping people.
Finally, the author asserts, funding re4sult in forest biodiversity and protect species from extinictios. The professor contradicts this notion. He states, increae in forest population will encourage owmers to benefit from thses trees commercialy. They try to use these plants in industries. As a ressult increase in biodiversity would not protect forest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | talelaldabous | 75 | view |
- Cars are paramount type of transportation they are one of necessary things in live whether cars in twenty years become fewer that today every one has a different view point Some believe in the following decades there are fewer cars other have different pe 60
- As a human being population is largely increase there is decreasing in the land used to endanger animals the question is whether the land should save to provide human needs or for saving animals this can be weighed from many aspects In my perceptive I con 66
- The passage and lecture are about the presence of fossilized trees in Arizona since 200 million years old The writer claims these fossilized structures not for bees he gave several arguments The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article She states 76
- The reading passage and lecture are both about colonization of our solar system The writer claim that if we are willing to colonize solar system Saturn moon Titan is a better place The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He says mars is still be 42
- The reading passage and the lecture are talking about agnostids which were a group of marine animals that become extincted and how these species lkived The writer claims several theories about how agnostids lived However the lecturer debates these therori 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hat, this fund have several advantages. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iving this fund to owners and farms will prevent logging industry and oil compani...
^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...ure itselef cause damage to forest more that that from industries and deforestation. More...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... protect forest or for helping people. Finally, the author asserts, funding re4...
^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... try to use these plants in industries. As a ressult increase in biodiversity woul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71138211382 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04898915275 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.203533868 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.25 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.3 21.698381199 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.35 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490358248359 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138005274239 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139788894403 0.0662205650399 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325322835091 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.254280600479 0.0443174109184 574% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.95 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.