The reading passage and lecture talk about replacement of traditional medical records to electonric version. The writer claims several benefits from using electric record in medical fiels. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions all benefits of electronic records are unconvincing.
First, the author state, using of electronic records help in saving money. This is because, it will reduce papers and needing for space to store thses records. The lecturer refutes this argument. She mentions, electronic records will not reduce costs, because doctors still saving pateints records even after print them in databases. Furthermore, they need papers for coping. As a result if there are papers, doctors still need storage to keeps papers and record that might use them in any legel stuation.
Second, the author asserts, replacing of traditional records with electronic one will decreas errors from hand writing. This statement is challenged by professor, She elaborates on docters who writes pateint information and summary of visits on papers, then give them to front desk taff to peint them on computers. These employee might make mistake during printing. In addation, they can not realize perfectly docters hand writing. Therefore, mistake from hanh writing might happen even use electronic records.
Finally, the writer mentions, electronic records help docters to to gather a lot of information about their pateints. The lecturer rebuts this idea. She says, pateint information is hardly to access, since there are a very stricts rules access them. Moreover may pateint block their information and do not accept any one to use them.
The reading passage and lecture talk about replacement of traditional medical records to electonric version. The writer claims several benefits from using electric record in medical fiels. However, the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She mentions all benefits of electronic records are unconvincing.
First, the author state, using of electronic records help in saving money. This is because, it will reduce papers and needing for space to store thses records. The lecturer refutes this argument. She mentions, electronic records will not reduce costs, because doctors still saving pateints records even after print them in databases. Furthermore, they need papers for coping. As a result if there are papers, doctors still need storage to keeps papers and record that might use them in any legel stuation.
Second, the author asserts, replacing of traditional records with electronic one will decreas errors from hand writing. This statement is challenged by professor, She elaborates on docters who writes pateint information and summary of visits on papers, then give them to front desk taff to peint them on computers. These employee might make mistake during printing. In addation, they can not realize perfectly docters hand writing. Therefore, mistake from hanh writing might happen even use electronic records.
Finally, the writer mentions, electronic records help docters to to gather a lot of information about their pateints. The lecturer rebuts this idea. She says, pateint information is hardly to access, since there are a very stricts rules access them. Moreover may pateint block their information and do not accept any one to use them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture about the the golden frog andv the severity of fungus that infects frog The author suggests three solutions to golden fungus problem The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article she says these solutions are not effective to 76
- Today there is a high competetion between people to get a suitable job Therefore whether people should take any work when there is chance to get it or it should be wait to get more satisfying one Every one has a different point of view Admittedly some pre 60
- The passage and lecture are discussing the possibility of using stars as navigation by humpback whales The author claims there are evidence explain that humpback use stars for navigation The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She mentions these 80
- The reading passage and lecture are both about Pterosaurs which were ancient group of winged reptiles that lived together with dinosaurs and if they were capable of powered flight or just glide The writer claims several argument to explain that Pterosaurs 68
- Cars are paramount type of transportation they are one of necessary things in live whether cars in twenty years become fewer that today every one has a different view point Some believe in the following decades there are fewer cars other have different pe 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... might use them in any legel stuation. Second, the author asserts, replacing of...
^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this employee' or 'These employees'?
Suggestion: This employee; These employees
...t desk taff to peint them on computers. These employee might make mistake during printing. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ntions, electronic records help docters to to gather a lot of information about their...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t information is hardly to access, since there are a very stricts rules access th...
^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e are a very stricts rules access them. Moreover may pateint block their information and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...ock their information and do not accept any one to use them.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, therefore, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43076923077 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55160930771 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588461538462 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6044150985 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3157894737 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6842105263 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356689857445 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118803555617 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154716161596 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265064031227 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.288943338617 0.0443174109184 652% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.62 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.