The passage and lecture are both about the advanteges of salvage logging to the damage forest and to the economy The writer believes that salvage loggind is beneficial to the forest and economy he gives three reasons The lecturer casts doubt on claim made

Essay topics:

The passage and lecture are both about the advanteges of salvage logging to the damage forest and to the economy. The writer believes that salvage loggind is beneficial to the forest and economy, he gives three reasons. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She says the reasons which are given in article are guetionable, moreover salvage logging can result to serious damage to the forest.
First, the author claims, after fire, forests are choked wtth dead tree, therefore, salvage logging removes the remains of dead trees to provide space for new trees to grow. This point challenged by lecturer, She mentions that, removing dead trees not necessary to groing of new planets, we can see trees in the fire forest without salvade logging, in addition, salvage logging remove the tree and prevent their decompostion, as a result this will effect the fertility of the soil.
Second, the authoe argues, salvage loggings reduce the harm of insects that occur from decaying of wood, thus contiruting to healthof the forest. This urgument rebuts by professor, She states, insects are always fond in the forest with out segnificant danger, furthermore, the harm from logging is more that that from fire.
Finally, the writer points out, savage loggings have economic benefits, help to create additional jobs for local residents, because salvage loggings need more worker than traditional loggings. The lecturer in the other hand illustrates,salvage loddings need helicobter to lift the tree in addition to the workers, moreover this work is temprory, and the residents workers have more experience than the new workers.

The passage and lecture are both about the advanteges of salvage logging to the damage forest and to the economy. The writer believes that salvage loggind is beneficial to the forest and economy, he gives three reasons. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article. She says the reasons which are given in article are guetionable, moreover salvage logging can result to serious damage to the forest.
First, the author claims, after fire, forests are choked wtth dead tree, therefore, salvage logging removes the remains of dead trees to provide space for new trees to grow. This point challenged by lecturer, She mentions that, removing dead trees not necessary to groing of new planets, we can see trees in the fire forest without salvade logging, in addition, salvage logging remove the tree and prevent their decompostion, as a result this will effect the fertility of the soil.
Second, the authoe argues, salvage loggings reduce the harm of insects that occur from decaying of wood, thus contiruting to healthof the forest. This urgument rebuts by professor, She states, insects are always fond in the forest with out segnificant danger, furthermore, the harm from logging is more that that from fire.
Finally, the writer points out, savage loggings have economic benefits, help to create additional jobs for local residents, because salvage loggings need more worker than traditional loggings. The lecturer in the other hand illustrates,salvage loddings need helicobter to lift the tree in addition to the workers, moreover this work is temprory, and the residents workers have more experience than the new workers.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-05 talelaldabous 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user talelaldabous :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both about t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...st and economy, he gives three reasons. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esult to serious damage to the forest. First, the author claims, after fire, fo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...eir decompostion, as a result this will effect the fertility of the soil. Second...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will effect the fertility of the soil. Second, the authoe argues, salvage loggi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
..., insects are always fond in the forest with out segnificant danger, furthermore, the ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...thermore, the harm from logging is more that that from fire. Finally, the writer p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m logging is more that that from fire. Finally, the writer points out, savage l...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
...esidents, because salvage loggings need more worker than traditional loggings. The lecturer...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , salvage
...e lecturer in the other hand illustrates,salvage loddings need helicobter to lift the tr...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23664122137 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59540862144 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1374709086 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.2 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37608895708 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191925728595 0.0996497079465 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155056862602 0.0662205650399 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242454904467 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.243377057306 0.0443174109184 549% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.