Nowadays more and more people have access to the Internet. But constant availability of any information worsens people's memory and critical thinking skills.
The psychologist's perception of people's memory and critical thinking skills are aggravated by the internet. For instance, Google searching machines give people enough information and remembering is not important. However, my research on this subject is negative. The internet gives us technical innovation
In my first argument, people’s memory is not affected by the internet. Nowadays, With the development of Society. People have to work long hours and many things to remember. That brings out the non-core information, so people could keep them into the apps on smart devices and delete them when unnecessary. Therefore, that doesn’t aggravate people’s memory. A big benefit, technology helps people to draw charts or mind maps. These tools give clear points of the document to help remember faster and longer. ,
In another argument, critical thinking is not deteriorated when people use the internet for searching information. People could read the data in all involving sources and collect before it becomes minimalism for analysis. people compare the structure of content for the sources. Polyhistors could find the mistake of the author easily which shows people apply critical thinking to find good answers. But there are some skeptics that some psychologists demonstrate with views that Technology superseded humans. Followed by, critical thinking will be not important and ignorantness will be aggravated. In fact, it is just dubious theory
To conclude, The internet is not harmful or gives people any negative effects on memory and critical thinking. People just use it logically, it will bring great benefits to our lives and contribute to the development of applied science in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-22 | KEVA | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 51 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | nicktyranov | 82 | view |
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 84
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- The chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'psychologists'' or 'psychologist's'?
Suggestion: psychologists'; psychologist's
The psychologists perception of peoples memory and critic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 509, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ent to help remember faster and longer. , In another argument, critical thinking...
^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ore it becomes minimalism for analysis. people compare the structure of content for th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated. In fact, it is just dubious theory To conclude, The internet is not harmful...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, therefore, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49621212121 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86518240308 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0813010419 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6111111111 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323635493678 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10142974633 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880628386629 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206193810844 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265759827018 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.