Overall, there was an upward trend in the total production of forestry in the UK. Furthermore, the volume of paper and packaging was consistently the highest among of them.
To begin with , in 1980 , about 240 millions tonnes of paper and packaging were produced , which went up slightly to 250 million in 1990. From 1990 to 2000 , there was a more considerable growth of a hundred million to reach the peak of approximately 350 million at the end of the period , or almost double.
On the contrary , the amount of sawn-wood was the smallest. Between 2019 , the figure for sawn-wood marginally declined by five-forth from 200 million tonnes to 150 million. Subsequently , this figure continued decreasing , but slower than before , and reached roughly 140 million in 2000.
Last , the ouput of wood pulp saw a fluctuation during the period. From 1980 to 2000 , roughly 116 million tonnes were manufactured which fell by 10 million in 1990 before decreased to 150 million again at the end of the period .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... highest among of them. To begin with , in 1980 , about 240 millions tonnes of ...
^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mong of them. To begin with , in 1980 , about 240 millions tonnes of paper and ...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nes of paper and packaging were produced , which went up slightly to 250 million i...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o 250 million in 1990. From 1990 to 2000 , there was a more considerable growth of...
^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ely 350 million at the end of the period , or almost double. On the contrary ,...
^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... , or almost double. On the contrary , the amount of sawn-wood was the smalles...
^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sawn-wood was the smallest. Between 2019 , the figure for sawn-wood marginally dec...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lion tonnes to 150 million. Subsequently , this figure continued decreasing , but ...
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ently , this figure continued decreasing , but slower than before , and reached ro...
^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nued decreasing , but slower than before , and reached roughly 140 million in 2000...
^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hed roughly 140 million in 2000. Last , the ouput of wood pulp saw a fluctuatio...
^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion during the period. From 1980 to 2000 , roughly 116 million tonnes were manufac...
^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...0 million again at the end of the period .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76029751872 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6025347189 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 1.69756097561 766% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156311909354 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739423327067 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355291650311 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991587341497 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033803926551 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.