The line graph shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
The line chart gives information about the amount of paper, sawn-wood and wood pulp produced in the UK between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, while the amount of paper and wood pulp follow an upward trend, the opposite is true for the figure for sawn-wood in the last period. Besides, of the three types of wood products, the amount of paper and packaging is always the largest throughout the period shown.
In 1980, paper production in the UK amounted to around 225 million tonnes, while only 200 million and about 175 million tonnes of sawn-wood and wood pulp was produced. In the year 1990, the paper and packaging production rose to 250 million. Also, this year witnessed a decrease in the production of both sawn wood and wood pulp. To be specific, there was a marginal drop of 50 million in the amount of sawn-wood produced and the wood pulp production gently decreased by approximately 25 million tonnes.
In 2000, after increasing slowly in 1990, the UK production of paper and packaging dramatically went up to 350 million. Meanwhile, there was an increasing fluctuation in the amount of wood-pulp produced, rising by about 20 million tonnes. Besides, the sawn-wood production still experienced a gradual dip to over 125 million.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-26 | julwery2508 | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the changes that took place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 61
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 20
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 73
- The diagram shows how the horse evolved through time with particular emphasis on its foot structure 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94230769231 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67506497737 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6954255374 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288474095199 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149920521636 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078881712644 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221432242954 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07614007984 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.