The line graph below shows the number of international conferences in three cities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart gives information about the figure for global meetings organized in three various cities over a 45-year period.
Overall, while the number of conferences held in city C followed an upward trend, the opposite was true for that of global meetings in city A and city B. Also, city C experienced the biggest changes over the period shown among the three cities.
In 1965, the quantity of meetings organized in city A was 35, in comparison with around 31 conferences of city B and 0 congresses of city C. 30 years later, while there was a dramatic increase by approximately 28 in the number of global meetings held in city C, the figure for conferences in city A experienced a decreasing fluctuation, falling to about 27. In contrast, the quantity of congresses in city B decreased gradually to 26.
Over the next 15 years, the figure for meetings in both two cities A and B followed a downward trend to 20 and 25 respectively. On the contrary, after slightly decreasing in 2005, the number of international conferences in city C rose back to almost 30 and became the highest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | Han Duyen | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | viethung123 | 73 | view |
- Question 4 Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Question 4 Some people 89
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 55
- The diagram shows how the horse evolved through time with particular emphasis on its foot structure 78
- The maps below show the development of a seaside village between 1995 and the present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70680628272 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91940102294 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502617801047 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8873413504 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200883488925 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101052027456 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431317881422 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135452627969 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164872821789 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.