Essay 5: Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be used for their future careers. Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The importance of non-academic subjects has always been a topic of controversy. While some people consider focusing on teaching the academic subjects related to the future job in school as an effective strategy, others believe that it is also vital for students to learn music and sport. In this essay, I will elaborate on these two viewpoints and give the reason why I suppose it is beneficial for schools to teach both academic and non-academic subjects.
On one hand, academic subjects are crucial because they are strongly linked to numerous beneficial outcomes. First, while studying academic subjects like Maths or Physics, students have to solve many logical problems, which results in developing logical problem-solving skill. This skill helps them to tackle many day-to-day problems logically in real life. Secondly, students who study academic subjects are equipped necessary knowledge to pass the entrance exams and obtain qualifications. Therefore, disciplines can also promote their job prospects since recruiters know that students have the fundamental knowledge to adapt to the diversity of career requirements.
On the other hand, young people can benefit greatly from sports and performing arts. They bring up for youngsters the chance to remove tensions resulting from their physical and mental needs. For instance, when students participate in athletic activities, socialize and communicate in a healthy way, their feelings and thoughts can be driven in positive directions. In addition, many students have hidden talents in non-academic fields like art or sports so if schools remove those kinds of subjects like music or PE, these strengths can go undetected. For that reason, schools should also concentrate on non-academic lessons so that young talents can be spotted and nurtured to achieve their full potential.
In conclusion, academic and non-academic subjects are equally important, and I am completely in favor of devoting equal attention to both types of subjects.
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 73
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 61
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy way" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...c activities, socialize and communicate in a healthy way, their feelings and thoughts can be dri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54901960784 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93751405962 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601307189542 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0981900391 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348067399925 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112232617416 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746832361087 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200820787887 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971562365643 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.