The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the rate of African subscribers to mobile and landline phones over a ten-year period starting from 1994.
It is clear that there was an upward trend in the figure for Africans subscribing to each type of telephone. Also, significantly bigger increases were observed in the rate of cell phone users in Africa over the period shown.
In 1994, the percentage of African subscribing to fixed line phones was 1.7%, which was considerably higher than the proportion of cell phone subscribers, at a mere 0.06%. Over the next 7 years, these figures rose gradually to the same level of roughly 3% in 2001.
From 2001 onwards, the rate of landline phone users in Africa went up slowly, reaching a peak of 3.1% at the end of the period. In the meantime, the figure for African people using mobile handsets overtook the proportion of those subscribing to fixed line telephones, surging to a high of 8.8%, nearly triple the figure for fixed line phone subscribers in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | anhminhbnvn1 | 11 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | Hoaianh | view | |
| 2021-08-07 | Han Duyen | 77 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Han Duyen | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Question 3 Some people say that protecting the environment is the government s responsibility Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 825.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82456140351 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61173807002 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2526859187 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.857142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2460337632 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111133615305 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845000105199 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162201619847 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643423497227 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.