The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the proportion of people in 4 various age range going to the cinema monthly in Great Britain over a 16-year period.
Overall, the shares of people in 4 age groups who went to the movie once a month followed an upward trend. Also, the rate of people aged 15-24 going to the film monthly was always the highest compared to other age groups.
In 1984, the percentage of the 15-24 age group who went to the movie every month was around 17%, much higher than the rate of people agedup35, at a mere of roughly 1%. The period between 1984 and 2000 witnessed a gradual increase in the proportion of people age 15-24 and 35 and visiting the movie theater monthly, by about 58% and 15% respectively.
Regarding the other categories, initiating at 10% in 1984, the percentage of cinema-goers in the 7-14 age bracket significantly increased to about 37% in 1999 before slightly increasing by 32% in the next year. Meanwhile, the figure for persons in the 25-25 age range experienced an increase to roughly 25% in 1994 before a 5-year period of stability from 1994 to 1999. Over the next 5 years, an increase of approximately 7% was witnessed in the share of people aged 25-35 going to the cinema once a month in 2000.
- the importance of friendship 33
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 61
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60633484163 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5620371417 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506787330317 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1284044889 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219633661483 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118743873362 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692308713862 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156235620595 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455526938143 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.