The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The charts show how yearly expenditure by a particular school in the UK changedin 3 various years.
Overall, the share of teachers’ salaries was always the highest of the 5 different categories. In contrast, insurance accounted for the lowest percentage of the total school spending over the period shown.
In 1981, 40% of total expenditure by a particular school went to teachers’ salaries while the proportion of other workers’ salaries was 28%. Over the next 10 years, the rate of salaries of teachers slightly increased to 50%, about twice as much as that of other workers’ salaries, at 22%. In the year 2001, the figure for teachers’ salaries and other staff’s salaries followed a similar pattern, decreasing by 5% and 7%, respectively.
Turning to the remaining categories, resources and furniture and equipment constituted the same percentages, at 15% in 1981. 20 years later, the proportion of resources experienced a marginal rise to 20% then fell by 11%. In the meantime, this period showed a dramatic fluctuation in that of furniture and equipment, ranging between 5% and about 20%. Meanwhile, initiating at 2%, the rate of insurance considerably went up to 8% at the end of the period after increasing slowly by 1% in 1991.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
- The maps below show the changes that took place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 61
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 39
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16176470588 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06852956682 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9582919151 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147942490233 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595500810819 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073243327909 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108865408615 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846296679239 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.