The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the reasons why people choose to ride a bike or drive to work.
Overall, health and fitness and less pollution are the main reasons for cycling to work. Meanwhile, the largest proportion of people driving to work make their choice due to the fact driving is faster than cycling.
Looking at the figures for reasons for cycling, we can see that health and fitness and less pollution have the largest percentage of people choosing, at 30% each. The share of persons riding because of no parking problems ranks second, accounting for 15%. As regards the remaining categories, there are no significant differences in the rate of individuals who prefer riding a bicycle for no cost and faster than driving, at 13% and 12%, respectively.
Turning to the other chart, comfort is the key reason why people choose to drive to work, at 40%. The rate of those deciding to travel by car due to distance to work comes second, at 21%, while 14% persons who drive to work owing to faster than cycling or needing to carry things to work, corresponding. The proportion of individuals who favor driving over cycling on account of safety is 11%.
- The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030 61
- The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in Glasgow in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.795 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53865614056 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.690045381 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180868114317 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873182348705 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721362720945 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13697225092 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610014416759 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.